Confirmation
Direct
A self-disclosure, creator statement, official portfolio, or other primary source explicitly identifies the persona as synthetic.
Methodology v0.1
Evidence before impression. Always.
We review the public presentation of an Instagram profile. We do not judge the value, character, or safety of a person behind it.
The publication threshold
Every public conclusion must be explainable, sourced, dated, and confirmed by a human reviewer. “It looks AI” is a lead, not a finding.
Independent signal
Strong
A significant, repeatable indicator such as matching creator provenance or material identity inconsistency across independent sources.
Context
Supporting
Relevant context that can reinforce a case but cannot determine a verdict on its own.
Not decisive
Weak
Aesthetic impressions, follower patterns, missing livestreams, or a single detector result never decide a public verdict.
Verdict rules
- AI identity confirmed
- Requires at least one direct, publicly verifiable source.
- Likely AI-generated identity
- Requires at least two independent strong sources, or one strong source with multiple independent supporting sources and explicit reviewer reasoning.
- AI-assisted or mixed identity
- Requires evidence of a real operator or subject and evidence of material AI transformation in how that identity is presented.
- Inconclusive
- Not published as an accusation. Insufficient evidence means no verdict.
Review history and corrections
Published reviews are not silently rewritten. A material correction creates a new review and the earlier version remains in the history. Evidence may be hidden when privacy, safety, or copyright concerns require it.